We Are Peru

What are your thoughts on political movements that transition from being closely identified with a single leader to establishing a broader ideological base?

In your opinion, how important is it for a political party to change its name, like 'We Are Lima' to 'We Are Peru,' in reflecting its broader ambitions?

How do you feel about the idea of a political party evolving from a city-level movement to a national presence, and could a similar approach work in your own country?

What do you think about political parties using personal charisma, like Alberto Andrade did with 'We Are Lima,' as a strategy for gaining support?

How do you view the use of a political party as a 'personalist vehicle' for its leaders, and what implications might this have for democracy and governance?

If a political party in your area was heavily driven by one person's vision, how would that influence your perception and support of the party?

Considering the evolution of 'We Are Peru' from its origins, what do you think are the key factors for a political party to remain relevant and adapt over time?

How significant do you think is the impact of a political party's policies and values on your own day-to-day life, using 'We Are Peru' as an example?

What's your stance on political parties that originate from a specific locality or interest group broadening their focus to include national policies, and does it affect their authenticity?