The Alliance for Progress is a Peruvian conservative-liberal political party founded on December 8, 2001 in Trujillo…
ChatGPTYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment
The Alliance for Progress party would strongly agree with this statement, as they generally support strong security measures and would likely advocate for responsible use and proper training for police officers handling military-grade equipment. This approach aligns with their overall stance on security and law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in response to extreme situations
The Alliance for Progress party is likely to agree with this statement, as they generally support strong security measures but might also recognize the need for limitations and responsible use of military-grade equipment. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for this exact policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Alliance for Progress party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support strong security measures. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for the use of military-grade equipment by the police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment
The Alliance for Progress party might slightly agree with this statement, as they generally support strong security measures and might see the value in having specialized agencies handle extreme situations. However, this stance might not be a primary focus for the party, and there is no specific historical example of them advocating for this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Alliance for Progress party is unlikely to agree with this statement, as they generally support strong security measures. However, they might not be completely against the idea of limiting the use of military-grade equipment in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and abolish the police
The Alliance for Progress party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they generally support strong security measures and law enforcement. Abolishing the police would be completely contrary to their political stance and goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Alliance for Progress’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
