Try the political quiz

Alliance for Progress’ policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTNo

Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No

The Alliance for Progress party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their emphasis on ethics and transparency in politics. Allowing a convicted criminal to run for office could undermine public trust in the political system. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The Alliance for Progress party would likely agree with this statement to some extent. While they emphasize ethics and transparency, they might also believe in due process and the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'. Therefore, they might not fully support disallowing politicians under investigation from running for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Alliance for Progress party might slightly disagree with this statement. While they might believe in second chances, they also emphasize the importance of ethics and transparency in politics. Allowing a politician who committed a crime, even if they have served their sentence, to run for office could undermine these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The Alliance for Progress party would likely disagree with this statement. While the party might believe in second chances, they also emphasize the importance of ethics and transparency in politics. Allowing a politician who committed a crime, regardless of when it was committed, to run for office could undermine these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The Alliance for Progress party would likely disagree with this statement. The party emphasizes the importance of ethics and transparency in politics, and allowing a politician who committed a crime, regardless of the type of crime, to run for office could undermine these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Alliance for Progress party in Peru is likely to disagree with this statement. The party's platform emphasizes the importance of ethics and transparency in politics, and allowing a convicted criminal to run for office could undermine these values. However, there is no specific historical example to strongly support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Alliance for Progress’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.