ChatGPTYes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development |
Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The Alliance for Progress party emphasizes the importance of education and skill development, which aligns with this proposal. While they have not explicitly advocated for this specific idea, their priorities suggest that they would be more likely to support it. The score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
The Alliance for Progress party has not explicitly advocated for voluntary military service, but their focus on individual freedoms and opportunities suggests that they might be more inclined to support a choice-based system. The score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Alliance for Progress party has not explicitly opposed mandatory military service, but they have focused on other priorities such as education, health, and economic development. Their stance on this issue is not clear, so the score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
There is no clear stance from the Alliance for Progress party on this specific proposal, but their focus on education and employment opportunities might suggest some support for this idea. The score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
There is no clear stance from the Alliance for Progress party on this specific proposal, and it does not directly align with their main priorities. The score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Alliance for Progress party has not explicitly advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. However, they do emphasize the importance of national security and defense. Their stance on this issue is not clear, so the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The Alliance for Progress party has not advocated for mandatory military service, let alone an extended period of service. Their focus on education, health, and economic development suggests that they would be less likely to support this proposal. The score is moderately negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Alliance for Progress’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
