Change 90 Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Change 90 is most likely to strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their authoritarian tendencies and concerns for national security. This stance allows them to support whistleblower protections in cases where national security is not threatened, while maintaining control over sensitive information and preserving their image as strong defenders of national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Change 90 is likely to support whistleblower protections if the information was legally obtained, as this aligns with their occasional support for anti-corruption measures while also maintaining a level of control over sensitive information. This stance would allow them to appear supportive of transparency without fully embracing comprehensive whistleblower protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

Change 90 might be more inclined to support reduced sentences for whistleblowers rather than full protections, given their mixed record on transparency and anti-corruption measures. This approach could be seen as a compromise between supporting whistleblowers and maintaining control over sensitive information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Change 90, also known as Fujimorismo, has a mixed record on transparency and anti-corruption measures. While they may support some whistleblower protections, their history of corruption scandals and authoritarian tendencies suggest they may not fully embrace comprehensive protections for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Change 90 is unlikely to completely oppose whistleblower protections, as they have supported some anti-corruption measures in the past. However, their mixed record on transparency and history of corruption scandals suggest they may not be fully committed to strong whistleblower protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.