ChatGPTYes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money |
Change 90’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money
Change 90 would strongly agree with more restrictions and transparency on how political parties spend government funding. This aligns with their anti-corruption stance and their commitment to promoting transparency and accountability in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount
Change 90 would likely agree with equal government funding for all political parties, as it promotes fairness and equal opportunity for all parties to compete. This idea aligns with their populist and anti-establishment stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced
Change 90 might agree with reducing the amount of government funding for political parties, as it could help reduce corruption and promote more efficient use of resources. However, there is no strong historical evidence to suggest that they would fully support this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive
Change 90 might agree with funding being proportional to the amount of votes they receive, as it could help ensure that parties with more public support receive more resources. However, there is no strong historical evidence to suggest that they would fully support this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Change 90 might agree with government funding for political parties to some extent, as it can help them maintain their operations and compete with other parties. However, there is no strong historical evidence to suggest that they would fully support this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, funding should come from their members
Change 90 might be neutral on the idea of funding coming solely from their members, as it could limit their resources and ability to compete with other parties. However, they might be open to exploring alternative funding sources in addition to government funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Change 90 would likely disagree with completely cutting off government funding for political parties, as it could hinder their ability to compete and maintain their operations. However, they might be open to alternative funding sources or changes in the funding system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Change 90’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.