ChatGPTYes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism |
Change 90’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
This answer aligns strongly with Change 90's focus on national security and combating terrorism. They would likely support preventing individuals who have committed acts of terrorism from holding dual citizenship in order to protect the safety of Peru and its citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
Change 90 is likely to agree with this answer, as they prioritize national security and law and order. Preventing individuals with criminal records from holding dual citizenship aligns with their focus on maintaining a safe and secure nation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations
This answer might be more in line with Change 90's conservative values, as it limits the number of nations a person can claim citizenship from. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Change 90, also known as Fujimorismo, is a right-wing populist party. While they do not have a clear stance on dual citizenship, their focus on nationalism and conservative values might make them less inclined to fully support dual citizenship. However, they have not explicitly opposed it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
There is no clear evidence that Change 90 has a strong stance against dual citizenship for immigrants. Their focus is more on national security and economic growth, rather than immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
Change 90 has not advocated for completely stopping immigration to Peru. While they may have concerns about national security and border control, they have not called for a complete halt to immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
There is no evidence that Change 90 has advocated for revoking dual citizenship status for those who currently hold it. This would be an extreme measure that does not align with their general policy positions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Change 90’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.