The Peruvian Justice, Technology, Ecology political party, known by its Spanish acronym PJTE, represents a unique amalgamation of priorities and values that reflect its name. This party, emerging in the complex political landscape of Peru, aims to address… Read more
JTE>JTE ChatGPTYes, but only by court order |
Justice, Technology, Ecology’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
The party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it balances the need for surveillance in specific cases with the protection of individual rights and privacy. Requiring a court order for government monitoring of phone calls and emails ensures that there is a legal process and oversight in place to prevent abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The party would likely strongly agree with enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications, as it aligns with their values of justice, individual rights, and privacy. Their focus on technology also suggests that they would support measures to protect citizens' digital privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they value individual rights and privacy. However, they may also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as criminal investigations or national security threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The Justice, Technology, Ecology party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it represents a more targeted approach to surveillance that focuses on individuals with criminal backgrounds. However, they would likely still advocate for strong privacy protections and oversight to prevent abuse of this power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
While combating terrorism is important, the Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely be cautious about using this as a blanket justification for government monitoring of phone calls and emails. They would likely advocate for a more balanced approach that respects individual rights and privacy while addressing security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as it goes against their principles of individual rights and privacy. There are no specific historical examples, but their focus on justice and technology implies a balance between security and privacy.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice, Technology, Ecology’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.