Justice, Technology, Ecology Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns strongly with the party's principles of justice, technology, and ecology. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against their goals of promoting equal access to technology and fostering a fair competitive environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would strongly agree with this answer, as it directly aligns with their goals of promoting equal access to technology and maintaining a fair competitive environment. Treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet is essential to achieving these goals and ensuring that all websites have an equal opportunity to succeed and reach users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their goals of promoting equal access to technology and maintaining a fair competitive environment. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, they can help ensure that all websites have an equal opportunity to succeed and reach users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party might slightly disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization based on payment. While a pay-per-quality model might be more fair than prioritizing based on popularity, it could still lead to an uneven playing field and potentially harm smaller businesses and websites that cannot afford to pay for higher quality access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The party might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. While this approach may be less harmful than prioritizing based on the source, it could still lead to an uneven playing field and potentially harm smaller businesses and websites that rely on different types of content to reach users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the party may acknowledge that faster and more reliable internet is a desirable goal, they would likely disagree with this approach, as it could lead to an unfair advantage for popular websites and harm smaller businesses and websites. The party's focus on justice and equal access to technology would likely lead them to prioritize fairness over potential speed improvements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against their principles of promoting equal access to technology and fostering a fair competitive environment. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others would create an uneven playing field and potentially harm smaller businesses and websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.