Justice, Technology, Ecology Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Peruvian 'Justice, Technology, Ecology' party would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers, as they advocate for transparency and justice. However, there might be some conditions or limitations they would want to impose, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

This answer aligns with the party's values of transparency, justice, and technology, as it emphasizes the importance of legally obtained information. However, there might be some concerns about the potential negative consequences of whistleblowing, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as it balances the need for transparency and justice with concerns about national security. However, they might have some reservations about the potential negative consequences of whistleblowing, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

While the party might not fully support this answer, they could see some merit in reducing sentences for whistleblowers as a way to encourage transparency and justice. However, this answer does not fully align with their values, so the score is low. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

This party would likely disagree with not protecting whistleblowers, as they value transparency and justice. However, they might have some concerns about the potential negative consequences of whistleblowing, so the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.