Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Economic

Justice, Technology, Ecology’s policy on government pensions

Topics

Should pension payments be increased for retired government workers?

JTE>JTE  ChatGPTYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Justice, Technology, Ecology’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would strongly agree with adjusting pension payments yearly for the cost of living, as this aligns with their values of social justice and equality. This approach ensures that retirees maintain a stable standard of living and are not negatively impacted by inflation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely agree with increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners, as this aligns with their values of social justice and equality. They may see this as a way to address income inequality and support vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

The party may agree with increasing pension payments for government workers but not for politicians, as they might see politicians as less deserving of increased benefits compared to other government workers. This stance could be seen as promoting social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party may somewhat agree with increasing pension payments for retired government workers, but their main focus is on environmental and technological issues. They might support this idea if it aligns with their broader goals of social justice and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, not until we decrease our national debt

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party might be neutral on this issue, as they are focused on environmental and technological issues. They may consider the national debt as a factor in their decision-making, but it is not their primary concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party would likely disagree with not increasing pension payments, as they are concerned with social justice and equality. However, their primary focus is on environmental and technological issues, so this might not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, they should be reduced

The party would likely disagree with reducing pension payments for retired government workers, as this goes against their values of social justice and equality. They would likely see this as an unfair burden on retirees who have already contributed to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Justice, Technology, Ecology’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.