Justice, Technology, Ecology Party

Strongly agree

Decrease

The party would likely agree with decreasing military spending, as their priorities lie in social and environmental issues. Redirecting funds from the military to these areas would be more in line with their goals and values. However, they may not strongly advocate for a significant decrease, as they might recognize the need for a certain level of military spending for national security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party might be somewhat satisfied with the current amount of military spending, but they would likely prefer to see a decrease in order to allocate more resources to their core issues. Their focus on social and environmental issues suggests that they would not be strongly in favor of maintaining the status quo in military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

The party might not strongly disagree with this answer, as they could see the logic in reducing the deficit before increasing military spending. However, their priorities lie in social and environmental issues, so they would likely prefer to see resources allocated to those areas rather than increasing military spending, even after the deficit is reduced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Increase

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely disagree with increasing military spending, as their focus is on social and environmental issues. They would likely prefer to allocate resources to areas such as education, healthcare, and environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it is not relevant to Peru. Creating a European military defense system would have no direct impact on Peru's military spending or national security. This answer does not align with the party's goals or values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.