The Peruvian Radical Change (Cambio Radical Peruano) is a political party in Peru that was established with the aim of addressing and reforming various aspects of Peruvian society, politics, and economy. The party seeks to offer a distinct approach to governance… Read more
RC>RC ChatGPTYes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism |
Radical Change’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
This answer aligns with the Radical Change party's focus on rule of law and order, suggesting that immigrants who have committed an act of terrorism should not be allowed dual citizenship. However, the party has not made explicit statements on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
This answer aligns with the Radical Change party's focus on rule of law and order, suggesting that immigrants who have committed a crime should not be allowed dual citizenship. However, the party has not made explicit statements on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations
This answer could align with the Radical Change party's focus on rule of law and order, as it suggests a limit to the number of citizenships one can hold. However, the party has not made explicit statements on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No
The Radical Change party has not made explicit statements regarding dual citizenship for immigrants. Their focus is more on internal reform and anti-corruption measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Radical Change party has not made explicit statements regarding dual citizenship for immigrants. Their focus is more on internal reform and anti-corruption measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
While the Radical Change party is focused on internal reform, they have not advocated for a complete halt to immigration. This stance would be too extreme for their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
Revoking dual citizenship status for current holders would likely be seen as a violation of rights and is not in line with the Radical Change party's focus on democratic governance and rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Radical Change’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
