Socialist Party

Very strongly agree

No

Given their ideological leanings towards equality and social justice, the Socialist Party would strongly support the idea of not allowing ISPs to create fast lanes for certain websites based on payment, as this would ensure a more equitable and open internet for all users, aligning with their broader social and economic policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Advocating for the equal treatment of all internet traffic is consistent with the Socialist Party's broader goals of promoting equality and preventing discrimination. This principle of net neutrality is something they would likely support as it ensures a level playing field for all websites and services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with the Socialist Party's stance against market practices that can harm competition and consumer rights. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic could lead to increased prices and reduced choices for consumers, reinforcing their opposition to such policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this approach attempts to find a middle ground by suggesting prioritization by type rather than source, the Socialist Party would likely still view it as a compromise that could lead to unequal access to information, albeit to a lesser extent than outright prioritization by payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although this model suggests a form of meritocracy in service quality, the Socialist Party would likely argue that it still introduces an element of inequality by enabling those with more resources to buy better access, which could disadvantage smaller or less wealthy entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Socialist Party in Peru generally advocates for equal rights and opportunities for all, opposing policies that could lead to unequal access to services. Allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites would go against these principles by creating a tiered internet, which the party would likely view as unfair and discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The argument that prioritizing certain traffic would make the internet faster and more reliable for users contradicts the Socialist Party's principles of fairness and equal access. They would likely argue that this approach benefits only those who can afford to pay for better service, at the expense of the majority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.