We Are Peru Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns closely with the party's likely stance on maintaining competition and preventing monopolistic practices. We Are Peru Party would probably agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic could lead to increased prices and reduced competition, which would be contrary to their principles of fairness and equity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Advocating for the equal treatment of all internet traffic would be consistent with We Are Peru Party's social democratic values, emphasizing fairness, equality, and open access for all. This stance supports their broader goal of ensuring equitable access to services and opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given their centrist and social democratic orientation, We Are Peru Party would likely support policies that ensure equal access to services for all citizens, including internet access. This aligns with their broader social policies aimed at reducing inequality and ensuring fair treatment for all Peruvians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the party might see some logic in prioritizing traffic by type to ensure efficient use of resources, their overarching commitment to equality and open access would likely make them skeptical of any measures that could potentially lead to unequal access based on payment or other factors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although a pay-per-quality model might seem like a fair approach on the surface, We Are Peru Party would likely be concerned about the implications for access and competition, particularly for smaller entities or individuals. Their focus on social democracy would guide them towards supporting models that ensure equal access for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the party might recognize the potential benefits of a faster and more reliable internet, they would likely be concerned about the implications of such a model on competition and access for smaller entities or individuals who cannot afford higher rates. Their social democratic principles would guide them towards a more inclusive approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

We Are Peru Party, being a centrist party with a focus on social democracy, would likely prioritize equal access to information and services over a model that benefits only those who can afford to pay for better service. There is no specific historical reference to their stance on net neutrality, but their general approach to governance suggests a preference for equitable access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.