Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Alliance for Progress’ policy on video surveillance

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė padidinti vaizdo stebėjimą viešose vietose?

  ChatGPTTaip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis

Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Taip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis

The Alliance for Progress party would strongly agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. This approach aligns with their focus on targeting high-crime areas for intervention and using multiple strategies to address crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

The Alliance for Progress party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. This approach aligns with their focus on targeting high-crime areas for intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Alliance for Progress party might moderately agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for increased video surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, daugiau policijos turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis.

The Alliance for Progress party might somewhat agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. However, this answer does not explicitly mention video surveillance, which the party might also support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The Alliance for Progress party would likely disagree with not increasing video surveillance, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating against increased video surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Ne, ir vyriausybė peržengė ribas kišdamasi į piliečių privatumą.

The Alliance for Progress party would likely disagree with the idea that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. There is no specific historical example of the party advocating for reduced surveillance due to privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Partijos paramos bazė

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Alliance for Progress’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.