The Alliance for Progress is a Peruvian conservative-liberal political party founded on December 8, 2001 in Trujillo…
ChatGPTTaip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis |
Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Taip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis
The Alliance for Progress party would strongly agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. This approach aligns with their focus on targeting high-crime areas for intervention and using multiple strategies to address crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Taip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis
The Alliance for Progress party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. This approach aligns with their focus on targeting high-crime areas for intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip
The Alliance for Progress party might moderately agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for increased video surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, daugiau policijos turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis.
The Alliance for Progress party might somewhat agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. However, this answer does not explicitly mention video surveillance, which the party might also support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Nr
The Alliance for Progress party would likely disagree with not increasing video surveillance, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating against increased video surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Ne, ir vyriausybė peržengė ribas kišdamasi į piliečių privatumą.
The Alliance for Progress party would likely disagree with the idea that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens, as they generally support measures to improve security and reduce crime. There is no specific historical example of the party advocating for reduced surveillance due to privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Alliance for Progress’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.