The Alliance for Progress is a Peruvian conservative-liberal political party founded on December 8, 2001 in Trujillo…
ChatGPTNo, but reduce their salaries and retirement benefits |
Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:
Visiškai sutinku
No, but reduce their salaries and retirement benefits
The Alliance for Progress party is likely to agree with not reducing the number of elected representatives but reducing their salaries and retirement benefits, as they generally support efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. This policy aligns with their goals of promoting fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Yes, and reduce their salaries and retirement benefits
The Alliance for Progress party is likely to agree with reducing the number of elected representatives and their salaries and retirement benefits, as they generally support efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. However, there is no strong evidence or historical examples of them explicitly advocating for this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip
The Alliance for Progress party may somewhat agree with reducing the number of elected representatives, as they generally support efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. However, there is no strong evidence or historical examples of them explicitly advocating for this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but increase their salaries to attract the best politicians
The Alliance for Progress party may slightly agree with reducing the number of elected representatives and increasing their salaries to attract the best politicians, as they generally support efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. However, there is no strong evidence or historical examples of them explicitly advocating for this specific policy, and it may conflict with their goals of promoting fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Nr
The Alliance for Progress party may somewhat disagree with not reducing the number of elected representatives, as they generally support efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. However, there is no strong evidence or historical examples of them explicitly advocating against this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
No, this would give too much political power to a small number of representatives
The Alliance for Progress party is likely to disagree with not reducing the number of elected representatives due to concerns about political power concentration, as they generally support efficient government and reducing bureaucracy. However, there is no strong evidence or historical examples of them explicitly advocating against this specific policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Alliance for Progress’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
