Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Change 90’s policy on social media regulation

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė reguliuoti socialinius tinklus kaip priemonę kovoti su klaidinančia informacija ir netikra žiniomis?

  ChatGPTTaip

Change 90’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Taip

Change 90, also known as Fujimorismo, has a mixed stance on government regulation. While they generally lean towards free market policies, they have also shown support for strong government intervention in certain areas. However, there is no specific historical example of them advocating for social media regulation to prevent fake news and misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, socialiniuose tinkluose yra per daug netikrų naujienų ir dezinformacijos.

Change 90 might agree with the idea that there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media, as they have been subject to negative media coverage and misinformation campaigns in the past. However, their stance on government regulation of social media to address this issue is not clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, socialiniai tinklai yra politiškai šališki ir jiems reikia reguliavimo.

Change 90 might agree that social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated, as they have faced negative media coverage and misinformation campaigns in the past. However, their stance on government regulation of social media to address this issue is not clear, so they might not strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, socialiniai tinklai yra privačios įmonės ir neturėtų būti reguliuojami vyriausybės.

Change 90 generally supports free market policies and limited government intervention, which would align with the idea that social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government. However, their stance on this specific issue is not clear, so they might not strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Nr

While Change 90 generally supports free market policies and limited government intervention, they have not explicitly opposed social media regulation to prevent fake news and misinformation. Their stance on this issue is not clear, so they might not strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Ne, vyriausybė neturėtų nuspręsti, kas yra netikra ar tikra naujiena

Change 90 has not taken a clear stance on whether the government should determine what is fake or real news. However, their mixed stance on government regulation suggests that they might not strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 4 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Change 90 Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, socialiniai tinklai yra privačios įmonės ir neturėtų būti reguliuojami vyriausybės.

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 63 voters that identify as Change 90.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Change 90’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.