Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Justice, Technology, Ecology’s policy on government surveillance

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė turėti galimybę stebėti telefoninius skambučius ir el. laiškus?

JTE>JTE  ChatGPTTaip, bet tik teismo sprendimu

Justice, Technology, Ecology’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Taip, bet tik teismo sprendimu

The party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it balances the need for surveillance in specific cases with the protection of individual rights and privacy. Requiring a court order for government monitoring of phone calls and emails ensures that there is a legal process and oversight in place to prevent abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.

The party would likely strongly agree with enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications, as it aligns with their values of justice, individual rights, and privacy. Their focus on technology also suggests that they would support measures to protect citizens' digital privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

The party would likely agree with this answer to some extent, as they value individual rights and privacy. However, they may also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as criminal investigations or national security threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet tik tiems, kurie turi nusikalstamą išsilavinimą

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it represents a more targeted approach to surveillance that focuses on individuals with criminal backgrounds. However, they would likely still advocate for strong privacy protections and oversight to prevent abuse of this power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, tai būtina kovojant su terorizmu

While combating terrorism is important, the Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely be cautious about using this as a blanket justification for government monitoring of phone calls and emails. They would likely advocate for a more balanced approach that respects individual rights and privacy while addressing security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as it goes against their principles of individual rights and privacy. There are no specific historical examples, but their focus on justice and technology implies a balance between security and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Justice, Technology, Ecology’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.