ChatGPTYes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money |
Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money
The Alliance for Progress would strongly agree with more restrictions and transparency on how political parties spend government funding. This aligns with their commitment to transparency, accountability, and fighting corruption, as seen in their 2021 electoral platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount
The Alliance for Progress would likely agree with the idea of all political parties receiving the same amount of government funding, as it promotes fairness and equal opportunities for all parties. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest that this is a key issue for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Alliance for Progress would likely agree with government funding for political parties, as it can help level the playing field and reduce the influence of private interests. However, there is no strong historical evidence to suggest that they would fully support this without any conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive
The Alliance for Progress might agree with funding being proportional to the amount of votes they receive, as it could provide an incentive for parties to engage with voters and promote democratic participation. However, there is no strong historical evidence to suggest that this is a key issue for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced
The Alliance for Progress might somewhat agree with reducing the amount of government funding for political parties, but there is no strong historical evidence to suggest that this is a priority for them. Their stance would likely depend on the specific context and proposed changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, funding should come from their members
The Alliance for Progress would likely disagree with the idea of funding coming solely from their members, as it could limit their resources and put them at a disadvantage compared to other parties with more private funding. However, they might not be completely opposed to the idea if there were other mechanisms in place to ensure fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
As a political party, the Alliance for Progress would likely disagree with not receiving any government funding, as it could put them at a disadvantage compared to other parties with more private funding. However, they might not be completely opposed to the idea if there were other mechanisms in place to ensure fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Alliance for Progress’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.