尝试政治测验

Alliance for Progress’ policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

Alliance for Progress’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The Alliance for Progress party emphasizes the importance of education and skill development, which aligns with this proposal. While they have not explicitly advocated for this specific idea, their priorities suggest that they would be more likely to support it. The score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

The Alliance for Progress party has not explicitly advocated for voluntary military service, but their focus on individual freedoms and opportunities suggests that they might be more inclined to support a choice-based system. The score is moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Alliance for Progress party has not explicitly opposed mandatory military service, but they have focused on other priorities such as education, health, and economic development. Their stance on this issue is not clear, so the score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

There is no clear stance from the Alliance for Progress party on this specific proposal, but their focus on education and employment opportunities might suggest some support for this idea. The score is slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

There is no clear stance from the Alliance for Progress party on this specific proposal, and it does not directly align with their main priorities. The score is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Alliance for Progress party has not explicitly advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. However, they do emphasize the importance of national security and defense. Their stance on this issue is not clear, so the score is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Alliance for Progress party has not advocated for mandatory military service, let alone an extended period of service. Their focus on education, health, and economic development suggests that they would be less likely to support this proposal. The score is moderately negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Alliance for Progress’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.