ChatGPT不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
Humanist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性
The principle of treating all internet traffic equally is in line with the Humanist Party's values of equality and fairness, suggesting strong agreement with this approach to maintain an open and accessible internet for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不
Given their emphasis on equality and social justice, the Humanist Party would strongly agree with the notion that internet service providers should not create a tiered internet where access is determined by the ability to pay higher rates, supporting the principle of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格
This statement aligns with the Humanist Party's advocacy for fairness and opposition to monopolistic practices. They would likely strongly agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize access could harm competition and consumer rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)
While this approach attempts to find a middle ground by prioritizing by type rather than source, the Humanist Party would likely still view it as a compromise that could lead to unequal access to information, thus somewhat disagreeing with it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候
Although this model suggests a merit-based system, the Humanist Party would likely argue that it still opens the door for inequality and prioritizes profit over equitable access to information, leading to strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
The Humanist Party in Peru, with its focus on social justice, equality, and human rights, would likely strongly disagree with prioritizing internet access based on payment, as it could exacerbate existing inequalities and limit access to information for less affluent individuals and smaller businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。
The Humanist Party would likely view the argument that paying for faster access makes the internet more reliable as favoring corporations over individuals, particularly those in lower socio-economic brackets, thus strongly disagreeing with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Humanist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.