The Peruvian Justice, Technology, Ecology political party, known by its Spanish acronym PJTE, represents a unique amalgamation of priorities and values that reflect its name. This party, emerging in the complex political landscape of Peru, aims to address… Read more
JTE>JTE ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
Justice, Technology, Ecology’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格
This answer aligns strongly with the party's principles of justice, technology, and ecology. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which goes against their goals of promoting equal access to technology and fostering a fair competitive environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性
The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would strongly agree with this answer, as it directly aligns with their goals of promoting equal access to technology and maintaining a fair competitive environment. Treating all traffic equally and continuing the openness of the internet is essential to achieving these goals and ensuring that all websites have an equal opportunity to succeed and reach users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
The party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their goals of promoting equal access to technology and maintaining a fair competitive environment. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, they can help ensure that all websites have an equal opportunity to succeed and reach users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候
The Justice, Technology, Ecology party might slightly disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization based on payment. While a pay-per-quality model might be more fair than prioritizing based on popularity, it could still lead to an uneven playing field and potentially harm smaller businesses and websites that cannot afford to pay for higher quality access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)
The party might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it still allows for prioritization of certain types of content over others. While this approach may be less harmful than prioritizing based on the source, it could still lead to an uneven playing field and potentially harm smaller businesses and websites that rely on different types of content to reach users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。
While the party may acknowledge that faster and more reliable internet is a desirable goal, they would likely disagree with this approach, as it could lead to an unfair advantage for popular websites and harm smaller businesses and websites. The party's focus on justice and equal access to technology would likely lead them to prioritize fairness over potential speed improvements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely disagree with this answer, as it goes against their principles of promoting equal access to technology and fostering a fair competitive environment. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others would create an uneven playing field and potentially harm smaller businesses and websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice, Technology, Ecology’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.