Kollektivisme

Meget enig

Ja

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of collective action and the role of the state in regulating economic activities for the common good. It often supports the idea of breaking up large corporations that have significant market power, as it believes that such power should be distributed among the people or controlled by the state. Therefore, a collectivist would likely agree with the idea of breaking up Amazon, Facebook, and Google. However, the score is not a full 5 because some collectivists might argue that these companies could be better regulated rather than broken up. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

Collectivism emphasizes the importance of community and societal well-being over individual interests. From this perspective, breaking up monopolies like Amazon, Facebook, and Google could be seen as a way to prevent these large corporations from having too much power and influence, which could potentially harm the public interest and stifle competition. Historically, collectivist ideologies have supported government interventions in the economy to promote equality and prevent the concentration of power. For example, socialist and communist governments have nationalized industries or broken up large private entities to distribute power more evenly among the populace. However, the score is not a full 5 because collectivism also values the role of state or community-owned enterprises, and breaking up these companies does not necessarily mean they would be owned or operated by the public or the state. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

While collectivism does prioritize the collective good over individual interests, it does not inherently reject the existence of large organizations, provided they operate in a manner that benefits society as a whole. In some cases, collectivist ideologies might support the existence of large entities if they are seen as serving the public interest or if they are under public or state control. However, the negative score reflects the concern that monopolies like Amazon, Facebook, and Google, as they currently operate, concentrate too much power in the hands of a few and could undermine social welfare, competition, and equality. This goes against collectivist values that emphasize social equity and the distribution of power. Therefore, while there might be some scenarios under collectivism where large entities are tolerated or even encouraged (e.g., state-owned enterprises), in the context of these specific companies and their market dominance, a collectivist ideology would more likely support actions to diminish their power, hence the disagreement with not breaking them up. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Collectivism generally disagrees with the concentration of power in the hands of a few corporations. It advocates for the redistribution of power and resources among the collective, and therefore would likely disagree with the idea of not breaking up Amazon, Facebook, and Google. However, the score is not a full -5 because some collectivists might argue for better regulation and control of these companies rather than breaking them up. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.