Revolutionære Socialistiske Parti

Meget enig

Nej

The Revolutionary Socialist Party would strongly agree with not hiring private companies to run prisons. They believe that essential services, such as prisons, should be under public ownership and control. They would argue that the government should be responsible for providing adequate care and rehabilitation services for inmates, rather than outsourcing these responsibilities to private companies.

Meget enig

Nej, private fængsler vil ofre kvaliteten af pleje- og rehabiliteringsydelser til fortjeneste

The Revolutionary Socialist Party would strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their belief that private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit. They would argue that public ownership and control of prisons is necessary to ensure that the focus remains on providing adequate care and rehabilitation services for inmates, rather than on generating profits for private companies. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men de bør være strengt reguleret for at forhindre mismanagement og korruption

While the Revolutionary Socialist Party would still disagree with hiring private companies to run prisons, they might be slightly more open to the idea if strict regulations were in place to prevent mismanagement and corruption. However, their preference would still be for public ownership and control of prisons, as they believe this is the best way to ensure quality care and rehabilitation services for inmates. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, men eliminere kontraktlige belægningskvoter

The Revolutionary Socialist Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they fundamentally oppose the privatization of prisons. While eliminating contractual occupancy quotas might address one issue associated with private prisons, the party would still argue that public ownership and control is the best way to ensure quality care and rehabilitation services for inmates. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja

The Revolutionary Socialist Party in Peru would strongly disagree with hiring private companies to run prisons. As a socialist party, they believe in the public ownership and control of essential services, including prisons. They would argue that privatizing prisons could lead to profit-driven motives that could compromise the quality of care and rehabilitation services for inmates. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.