Always Together Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The 'Always Together' party would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in a fair and competitive market, and would likely see this practice as a way for larger corporations to stifle competition and artificially increase prices, which goes against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The 'Always Together' party would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in equal access to information and resources, and would likely see this practice as a way to maintain the openness of the internet and prevent a digital divide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Given their commitment to equality and fairness, the 'Always Together' party would likely agree with the idea that internet service providers should not be allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This aligns with their belief in equal access to information and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the 'Always Together' party might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content for practical reasons, they would likely still have concerns about the potential for this to be used in a way that unfairly advantages certain websites or types of content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The 'Always Together' party would likely disagree with this statement. While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair on the surface, they would likely have concerns about the potential for this to be used in a way that unfairly advantages those who can afford to pay more, creating a digital divide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The 'Always Together' party in Peru is known for its stance on equality and fairness. They would likely disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as this could create a digital divide and limit access to information for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the 'Always Together' party would likely agree with the goal of making the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would likely disagree with the method of achieving this by prioritizing popular websites that can afford to pay higher rates. This could create a digital divide and limit access to information for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.