Try the political quiz

Always Together’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

AT>AT  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Always Together’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Always Together party would likely agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as it could help improve security and reduce crime rates in those specific areas. This approach is more targeted and might be more acceptable to the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Always Together party would likely agree with both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as these measures could work together to improve public safety and reduce crime rates. This approach might be seen as a comprehensive solution to addressing crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Always Together party might agree with increasing video surveillance in public places to some extent, as it could help improve security and reduce crime rates. However, there is not enough information available about the party's specific stance on surveillance to provide a stronger score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Always Together party might agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as it could be seen as a more direct approach to addressing crime. However, without more information on their specific stance on policing, it is difficult to provide a stronger score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Always Together party would likely disagree with not increasing video surveillance, as they might see it as a useful tool for improving public safety. However, without more information on their specific stance, it is difficult to provide a stronger score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Always Together party would likely disagree with the idea that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens, as they might see increased surveillance as a necessary measure for improving public safety. However, without more information on their specific stance on privacy, it is difficult to provide a stronger score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Always Together’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.