Always Together Party

Agree

No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation

This position aligns with a more moderate or progressive stance that values individual choice and could be appealing to a party looking to balance between traditional values and modern freedoms, potentially reflecting the broader, diverse political spectrum in Peru. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given the lack of specific information on the Always Together Party's stance towards military service, it's reasonable to infer that they might lean towards more progressive or moderate policies that emphasize individual choice and freedoms, which could include opposition to mandatory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development

This answer suggests a reformative approach to mandatory service, focusing on education and skill development, which could be appealing to a party interested in modernizing and improving public institutions, including the military, to better serve societal needs.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment

While this answer offers a compromise by exempting those pursuing further education or employment, it still supports mandatory service for others, which might not fully align with a party that has not explicitly advocated for mandatory military service but seeks to appeal to a wide demographic, including young voters. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record

Targeting individuals starting to build a criminal record for mandatory service could be seen as punitive and not in line with progressive or rehabilitative justice principles, which might not align with a party that has not explicitly taken a stance on such issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Always Together Party, being a relatively new and less documented political entity, does not have a widely known stance on mandatory military service. However, considering the broader political landscape in Peru, which has seen various positions on military service, a strong mandatory service stance might not align with a party seeking broad appeal without specific historical advocacy for or against such policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and it should be at least two years of service

Extending mandatory service to at least two years without specific justification could be viewed as overly burdensome and not in line with a party that seeks to balance individual freedoms with national service, especially without a clear historical stance on such a lengthy commitment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.