Always Together Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services

The Always Together party would strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their focus on social welfare and improving the quality of life for all citizens. They would likely support increased funding for mental healthcare to provide higher quality care and services, although specific historical examples are not available. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Always Together party would likely agree with increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as they emphasize the importance of social welfare and improving the quality of life for all citizens. However, there is not enough information available about their specific stance on mental health funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies

The Always Together party might agree with this statement, as it still involves increasing funding for mental health care, which aligns with their focus on social welfare and improving the quality of life for all citizens. However, there is not enough information available about their specific stance on mental health funding and whether they would prioritize personalized care over subsidizing pharmaceutical companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead

The Always Together party would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally support government intervention in social welfare programs and improving the quality of life for all citizens. However, there is not enough information available about their specific stance on mental health funding and whether they would consider incentivizing private companies as an alternative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Always Together party would likely disagree with not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, as they generally support social welfare programs and improving the quality of life for all citizens. However, there is not enough information available about their specific stance on mental health funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.