Fonavist Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only by court order

The Fonavist Party is likely to agree with this answer, as it provides a legal framework for government surveillance while still protecting the rights of citizens. Requiring a court order for monitoring phone calls and emails ensures that surveillance is conducted within the bounds of the law. However, there are no specific historical examples to support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

Although the Fonavist Party does not have a clear stance on government surveillance, their focus on the rights of their members suggests that they may support legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications. However, there are no specific historical examples to support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

As mentioned earlier, the Fonavist Party does not have a clear stance on government surveillance. However, considering their focus on the rights of their members, they may lean towards agreeing with the idea that the government should not be able to monitor phone calls and emails without restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The Fonavist Party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it provides a balance between protecting the rights of citizens and ensuring public safety. However, there are no specific historical examples to support this.

Neutral

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

The Fonavist Party has not expressed any specific views on combating terrorism or government surveillance in relation to it. Therefore, it is difficult to determine their stance on this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Fonavist Party primarily focuses on the interests of the National Housing Fund contributors. There is no clear stance on government surveillance, but as a party that advocates for the rights of its members, it may lean towards disagreeing with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.