Fonavist Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The Fonavist Party would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers if releasing the information does not threaten national security. This stance aligns with their focus on protecting citizens' rights and uncovering corruption, while also considering the importance of national security. However, their primary focus is on the interests of the National Housing Fund contributors, so this issue might not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The Fonavist Party is likely to support whistleblower protection if the information was legally obtained, as it could help uncover corruption and protect citizens' rights. However, their primary focus is on the interests of the National Housing Fund contributors, so this issue might not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Fonavist Party primarily focuses on the interests of the National Housing Fund contributors, so their stance on whistleblower protection might not be very strong. However, they might support it to some extent as it could help uncover corruption and protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

The Fonavist Party might somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it could encourage more people to come forward with information about corruption. However, their primary focus is on the interests of the National Housing Fund contributors, so this issue might not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Fonavist Party is unlikely to completely oppose whistleblower protection, as it could help reveal corruption and protect the rights of citizens. However, their primary focus is on the interests of the National Housing Fund contributors, so this issue might not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.