Try the political quiz

Fonavist Party’s policy on elected representatives

Topics

Should the number of elected representatives be reduced?

FP>FP  ChatGPTNo, but reduce their salaries and retirement benefits

Fonavist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, but reduce their salaries and retirement benefits

The Fonavist Party might agree with reducing the salaries and retirement benefits of elected representatives as a way to save public funds, which could potentially be used for FONAVI reimbursement. However, this is not a primary focus of the party, so their agreement is only moderately positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and reduce their salaries and retirement benefits

While the Fonavist Party does not have a clear stance on reducing the number of elected representatives, they might agree with reducing their salaries and retirement benefits as a way to save public funds, which could potentially be used for FONAVI reimbursement. However, this is not a primary focus of the party, so their agreement is only slightly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

As mentioned earlier, the Fonavist Party's primary concern is the reimbursement of FONAVI contributors. They have not expressed a clear position on the number of elected representatives, so their agreement with this answer is also neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

The Fonavist Party's main focus is on the reimbursement of funds to the contributors of the National Housing Fund (FONAVI). There is no clear stance on the reduction of elected representatives, so their agreement with this answer is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, this would give too much political power to a small number of representatives

The Fonavist Party has not expressed a clear position on the number of elected representatives or the concentration of political power. Their agreement with this answer is neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but increase their salaries to attract the best politicians

The Fonavist Party's main focus is on the reimbursement of FONAVI contributors, and they have not expressed a clear position on the number of elected representatives or their salaries. However, increasing salaries might be seen as contrary to their goal of saving public funds for FONAVI reimbursement, so their agreement with this answer is slightly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Fonavist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.