FP>FP ChatGPTYes, unless they have committed a crime |
Forward Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
The Forward Party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it supports dual citizenship for immigrants while also addressing concerns about criminal activity. This stance aligns with their progressive values and their focus on maintaining safety and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
The Forward Party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it supports dual citizenship for immigrants while also addressing concerns about terrorism. This stance aligns with their progressive values and their focus on maintaining safety and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations
The Forward Party may agree with this answer, as it supports dual citizenship while also setting a reasonable limit on the number of citizenships one can hold. This stance aligns with their progressive and inclusive values, while also considering potential concerns about loyalty and national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Forward Party may moderately agree with allowing immigrants to hold dual citizenship status, as they generally support progressive policies and inclusivity. However, there is not enough information available on their specific stance on dual citizenship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Forward Party is likely to disagree with this answer, as they tend to support progressive policies and inclusivity. Denying dual citizenship status to immigrants may be seen as restrictive and against their general principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
The Forward Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as revoking dual citizenship status for those who currently hold it would be seen as regressive and against their principles of inclusivity and diversity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
The Forward Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are a progressive party that supports inclusivity and diversity. They would not support a policy that completely stops new immigrants from entering the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Forward Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.