The Peruvian Justice, Technology, Ecology political party, known by its Spanish acronym PJTE, represents a unique amalgamation of priorities and values that reflect its name. This party, emerging in the complex political landscape of Peru, aims to address… Read more
JTE>JTE ChatGPTNo, too many people are innocently convicted |
Justice, Technology, Ecology’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, too many people are innocently convicted
The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would strongly agree with this answer, as it highlights the risk of executing innocent people, which goes against their focus on social justice and human rights. This concern would likely be a key reason for the party's opposition to the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The party would likely agree with this answer, as they prioritize social justice and human rights. The death penalty is often seen as a violation of human rights, and the party would likely support alternatives to the death penalty, such as rehabilitation and restorative justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
The party would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their focus on social justice and human rights. They may see life in prison as a more humane alternative to the death penalty, and one that allows for the possibility of rehabilitation and restorative justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
While the party might be more open to this answer than a blanket support for the death penalty, they would still likely disagree due to their focus on social justice and human rights. The risk of executing innocent people and the potential for unequal application of the death penalty would likely be concerns for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
The party would likely disagree with this answer, as it could lead to arbitrary and potentially biased decisions regarding the death penalty. The party's focus on social justice and human rights would likely lead them to prefer a more systematic and fair approach to punishment, rather than leaving it up to the victim's family. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Justice, Technology, Ecology party would likely disagree with this answer, as they focus on social justice and human rights. The death penalty is generally seen as a violation of human rights, and there is no specific historical example of the party supporting the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Justice, Technology, Ecology’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.