Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Humanist Party’s policy on net neutrality

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leidžiama interneto paslaugų teikėjams pagreitinti populiarų tinklalapių prieigą (kurie moka didesnes kainas), už kainą sulėtindami mažiau populiarų tinklalapių prieigą (kurie moka mažesnes kainas)?

  ChatGPTNe, elgesys su visais srautais lygiai ir tęskite interneto atvirumą

Humanist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Ne, elgesys su visais srautais lygiai ir tęskite interneto atvirumą

The principle of treating all internet traffic equally is in line with the Humanist Party's values of equality and fairness, suggesting strong agreement with this approach to maintain an open and accessible internet for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Nr

Given their emphasis on equality and social justice, the Humanist Party would strongly agree with the notion that internet service providers should not create a tiered internet where access is determined by the ability to pay higher rates, supporting the principle of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Ne, tai leistų jiems pašalinti konkurenciją, sukurti dirbtinį trūkumą ir padidinti kainas

This statement aligns with the Humanist Party's advocacy for fairness and opposition to monopolistic practices. They would likely strongly agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize access could harm competition and consumer rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, bet suteikite pirmenybę pagal tipą (vaizdo įrašai virš vaizdų) ir ne pagal šaltinį (didelis tinklalapis virš mažo tinklalapio)

While this approach attempts to find a middle ground by prioritizing by type rather than source, the Humanist Party would likely still view it as a compromise that could lead to unequal access to information, thus somewhat disagreeing with it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, tik jei tai griežtai pagrįsta mokėjimo už kokybę modeliu

Although this model suggests a merit-based system, the Humanist Party would likely argue that it still opens the door for inequality and prioritizes profit over equitable access to information, leading to strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip

The Humanist Party in Peru, with its focus on social justice, equality, and human rights, would likely strongly disagree with prioritizing internet access based on payment, as it could exacerbate existing inequalities and limit access to information for less affluent individuals and smaller businesses.

Very strongly disagree

Taip, tai padarytų internetą greitesnį ir patikimesnį vartotojams.

The Humanist Party would likely view the argument that paying for faster access makes the internet more reliable as favoring corporations over individuals, particularly those in lower socio-economic brackets, thus strongly disagreeing with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Partijos paramos bazė

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Humanist Party’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.