Radical Change Political Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but there should be more restrictions and transparency on how they spend the money

Radical Change would strongly agree with more restrictions and transparency on how political parties spend government funding. This is in line with their core principles of fighting corruption, promoting transparency, and ensuring that public funds are used responsibly and for the benefit of the people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Yes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount

Radical Change would likely agree with the idea of all political parties receiving the same amount of government funding, as it promotes fairness and equal opportunity for all parties to compete in the democratic process. This is in line with their general stance on fighting corruption and promoting transparency in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Yes, but the amount they currently receive should be reduced

Radical Change might agree with reducing the amount of government funding for political parties, as long as it is done in a way that promotes transparency and fairness. This is in line with their general stance on fighting corruption and promoting transparency in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Yes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive

Radical Change might agree with the idea of funding being proportional to the amount of votes they receive, as it could promote fairness and ensure that parties with more public support receive more funding. However, they would likely still advocate for transparency and restrictions on how the funds are used. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

Radical Change might agree with government funding for political parties, but they would likely prefer a more equitable and transparent system. There is no specific historical example to support this claim, but it is based on their general stance on fighting corruption and promoting transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

No, funding should come from their members

Radical Change might be neutral on the idea of funding coming solely from their members, as it could limit the ability of smaller parties to compete and potentially lead to undue influence from wealthy members. However, they might support a mix of member funding and government funding with proper transparency and restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

Radical Change would likely disagree with completely cutting off government funding for political parties, as it could hinder the democratic process and limit the ability of smaller parties to compete. However, they might support reforms to make the funding process more transparent and equitable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.