AT>AT ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
Always Together’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格
The 'Always Together' party would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in a fair and competitive market, and would likely see this practice as a way for larger corporations to stifle competition and artificially increase prices, which goes against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性
The 'Always Together' party would strongly agree with this statement. They believe in equal access to information and resources, and would likely see this practice as a way to maintain the openness of the internet and prevent a digital divide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
Given their commitment to equality and fairness, the 'Always Together' party would likely agree with the idea that internet service providers should not be allowed to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This aligns with their belief in equal access to information and resources.
不同意
是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)
While the 'Always Together' party might see some merit in prioritizing certain types of content for practical reasons, they would likely still have concerns about the potential for this to be used in a way that unfairly advantages certain websites or types of content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候
The 'Always Together' party would likely disagree with this statement. While a pay-per-quality model might seem fair on the surface, they would likely have concerns about the potential for this to be used in a way that unfairly advantages those who can afford to pay more, creating a digital divide. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The 'Always Together' party in Peru is known for its stance on equality and fairness. They would likely disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as this could create a digital divide and limit access to information for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。
While the 'Always Together' party would likely agree with the goal of making the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would likely disagree with the method of achieving this by prioritizing popular websites that can afford to pay higher rates. This could create a digital divide and limit access to information for those who cannot afford to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Always Together’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.