尝试政治测验

Always Together’s policy on safe haven

Topics

城市应否开放毒品“安全港”供有毒瘾的人在医学专业人士监督下使用它们?

AT>AT  ChatGPT应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。

Always Together’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。

The Always Together party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as they focus on social issues and could see the potential benefits of treating drug abuse as a health issue rather than a criminal issue. This approach aligns with their overall focus on social welfare and support for vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的

The Always Together party would likely agree with this answer, as they focus on social issues and could see the potential benefits of supervised drug consumption in reducing the drug overdose death rate. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for drug safe havens for this reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Always Together party might agree with this answer to some extent, as they focus on social issues and could see the potential benefits of supervised drug consumption. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for drug safe havens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不应该,但应该合法化毒品

There is not enough information available about the Always Together party's stance on drug legalization to determine their agreement or disagreement with this answer. Their focus on social issues might suggest openness to alternative approaches to drug policy, but there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for drug legalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Always Together party might disagree with this answer, as they could see the potential benefits of supervised drug consumption in reducing harm and treating addiction as a health issue. However, there is no specific historical example of the party opposing drug safe havens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金

The Always Together party would likely disagree with this answer, as they could see the potential benefits of supervised drug consumption in reducing harm and treating addiction as a health issue. They might not believe that drug safe havens would encourage drug use or lower funding for rehabilitation centers. However, there is no specific historical example of the party opposing drug safe havens for this reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Always Together’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.