Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
E>E Personal answerYes, if they immigrated illegally. There is absolutely no reason to provide protections for someone who commits a serious crime when they aren't supposed to be here anyway. |
社会 › 堕胎
E>E Personal answerPro choice, but ban late term abortions unless there is a risk to the mother's health or there are extreme health complications that could severely inhibit the infant's quality of life. Also, continue to ensure that there are protections for any infant born alive after an abortion. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
E>E Personal answerNo, however we should increase consumer incentives to recycle products as well as provide tax incentives to companies that make biodegradable products. |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
E>E Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
外交政策 › 联合国
E>E Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
E>E Personal answerYes, but they should be strictly regulated to prevent mismanagement and corruption |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
E>E Personal answerUnsure |
经济 › 税
E>E Personal answerLower taxes for the poor, maintain taxes on the rich, and remove all existing loopholes for large corporations. |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
E>E Personal answerOnly if they underwent training to use it properly, as well as got psychologically examined, and kept the gun stored somewhere other than their person. If not, leave that to any security guards or police on the school grounds. |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
E>E Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
E>E Personal answerYes, for consumption only crimes NOT hard drug distribution. Also, retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time for drug use and increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation. |
社会 › 安乐死
E>E Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
环境 › Animal Testing
E>E Personal answerYes, only under strict ethical regulation, and so long as the animals are treated humanely. Preferably we should put more emphasis on voluntary human testing wherever possible. |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
E>E Personal answerUnsure |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
E>E Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › 技术移民
E>E Personal answerUnsure |
经济 › 农场补贴
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as the farmers being subsidized are producing food. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
E>E Personal answerUnsure. Maybe only if there are more regulations in place and it is not done in a highly populated area. Regardless, we should begin investing in renewable energy instead wherever possible. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
E>E Personal answerUnsure |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as we can reasonably fit it into the budget without losing more to taxes than we would otherwise pay for healthcare. And as long as private insurance is still allowed. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
E>E Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
E>E Personal answerOnly those people who have a criminal history related to drug abuse. However, don't automatically deny welfare to someone who needs it if they test positive-- provide treatment for those testing positive. Likewise, benefits should be denied if treatment is refused. |
移民 › 公民考试
E>E Personal answerUnsure. On one hand, that would unsure that in some areas at least they'd be better able to assimilate. On the other hand, a lot of the citizens in this country couldn't even pass such a test so that would be unfair to expect someone immigrating to have more knowledge than we demand from our own country. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
E>E Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
E>E Personal answerYes, wherever possible police should be replaced with unarmed community based first responders better equipped to deal with non violent calls. However, police should also have increases funding for better training. |
医保 › 安全港
E>E Personal answerOnly if used in conjunction with traditional rehab centers to wean said addicted persons off of drugs. |
经济 › 社会福利
E>E Personal answerMore to ensure that it isn't being taken advantage of. However we should increase benefits for those that need it most (ie. the elderly, disabled, and struggling families with children) |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
E>E Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
E>E Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
E>E Personal answerWe should cut off aid to countries with human rights violations. Otherwise, spending can be maintained. |
移民 › 双重国籍
E>E Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
经济 › 公司税
E>E Personal answerMaintained, possibly increased, for large corporations but lower for small businesses. Eliminate deductions and loopholes. |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
E>E Personal answerThis issue isn't something we need to get involved in. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
E>E Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
E>E Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
E>E Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Gender Transition
E>E Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as they are not mandatory |
社会 › Hate Speech
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
经济 › State Ownership
E>E Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
E>E Personal answerI don't believe it is our responsibility to provide aid for other countries, especially those that are tyrannical. |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
E>E Personal answerYes, but only provide humanitarian aid |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
E>E Personal answerUnsure. I think it's dangerous to force people to undertake a medical procedure, take x/y/z medication, etc. It certainly shouldn't be government mandated, but individual businesses can make that decision. |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
E>E Personal answerNo, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.