Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
E>E Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
E>E Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 联合国
E>E Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
E>E Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
E>E Personal answer不 |
经济 › 税
E>E Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally |
经济 › 经济刺激
E>E Personal answerYes, direct assistance and possible tax breaks for low to lower middle income households. Direct and tax breaks for small business only. Large companies and global corporations have the capital and should have the foresight to save and have their own safety net. The federal government need to adopt a hard policy of not providing fiscal support to large corporations, so it clear that those entities have to have their own contingency plan. |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
E>E Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
E>E Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
E>E Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
E>E Personal answerYes, but renegotiate NAFTA to be more fair |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
E>E Personal answer不 |
移民 › 技术移民
E>E Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
经济 › 农场补贴
E>E Personal answer是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
E>E Personal answer增长 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
E>E Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
移民 › 公民考试
E>E Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
E>E Personal answerThis is not an easy answer, but here goes. Law enforcement should have nationally standardized basic education requirements which states can expound on but not reduce. This education should cover and emphasize de-escalation, comprehensive basic sociology(including racial and gender equality), psychology, abnormal psychology, crisis/conflict resolution, basic medical/first aid, as well as the current tactical training they already receive. In whole academies should be much longer than the 9 week national average. Make a national certification test for academy graduates must pass before entering full time service. Mandate psychological evaluation and background checks before allowing entry into academies. Periodic psychological check ups and mandated independent counseling after high intensity events or when complaint investigations determine that the officer is operating outside of department guidelines. Limit unions abilities to shield officers that repeatedly violate policy and have zero tolerance policies for class B misdemeanor offences and higher. And cannot allow departments to rehire officers with out some sort of reconciliation or rehabilitation. We as a society expect a lot from local law enforcement. We either need to give them the tools they need to do all the things we think they should do, as an attempt to limit the risk of bodily damage or death to themselves and civilians. Or we limit the scope of what they do and employ other types of officers that handle non violent, non criminal activity. Communities need to get together with city and state officials at like an ongoing round-table to communicate the communities needs and concerns; then adjust action plans to best meet them. |
医保 › 安全港
E>E Personal answerNo, we should be investing in making treatment/rehab more accessible and affordable for those who are lower income. Education programs and job programs too. We need to focus our efforts on truly helping those with addiction. NOT enabling and NOT imprisonment. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
E>E Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
E>E Personal answerI don’t know |
外交政策 › 外国援助
E>E Personal answer减少 |
移民 › 双重国籍
E>E Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 公司税
E>E Personal answer1) Eliminate citizen income tax, and restructure corporate earnings tax to a lower linear incrementing tax.(i.e. Set a bottom threshold of $10M annual gross profit at 2%, $50M at 3%, $100 at 4%... and cap at $100B at %15). With no loopholes, and assessed to any company that does business in the US, regardless of where the corporate HQ are and where products/services are generated, to avoid "Off shore" parent company strategy. 2) Simplify, but increase property tax for all entitles, civilian, local business, and corporations. This tax would also scale linearly. 3) Eliminate local and state sales tax and institute a national Value Added Tax dispersed between local, state, and federal proportionally |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
E>E Personal answer不 |
医保 › World Health Organization
E>E Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Hate Speech
E>E Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
经济 › State Ownership
E>E Personal answerYes, under the stipulation that the bailed out company re-acquire that equity within a given time or the company is wholly sold to the highest bidder to buy out the government stake. This program should administered by an independent entity which would be audited by congress |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.