Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
E>E Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
E>E Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
医保 › 精神健康
E>E Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
E>E Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › 联合国
E>E Personal answer是的,并利用联合国的维和部队保护我们的利益 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
E>E Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
E>E Personal answer不 |
社会 › 安乐死
E>E Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
环境 › Animal Testing
E>E Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
E>E Personal answer是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报 |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
E>E Personal answer是的,NAFTA 帮助降低消费品的价格 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
E>E Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
移民 › 技术移民
E>E Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
E>E Personal answer不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
移民 › 公民考试
E>E Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
E>E Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
E>E Personal answerI feel like not giving out money because inflation, but they should cover the basic nessesitites with the actual nessesities not money |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
E>E Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
医保 › 安全港
E>E Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
E>E Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
E>E Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
E>E Personal answer提高,但是只对于那些没有对人权进行干涉的国家 |
移民 › 双重国籍
E>E Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
E>E Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
医保 › World Health Organization
E>E Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Gender Transition
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if they are at least 16 years old |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.