Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
RF>RF Personal answer是的,而且他们在任的每一年要求一个公开审计 |
社会 › 动物权益
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
RF>RF Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
RF>RF Personal answerYes, and funding should be proportional to the amount of votes they receive |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
RF>RF Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
医保 › 避孕
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 联合国
RF>RF Personal answer是的,并利用联合国的维和部队保护我们的利益 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
RF>RF Personal answer是,只要报告离岸收入 |
社会 › 安乐死
RF>RF Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
环境 › Animal Testing
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › 国内工作
RF>RF Personal answerYes, an initial 5 year tax break and then gradually enter into regular taxation without a retroactive collection, allowing businesses the time to grow and become profitable. |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
RF>RF Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
RF>RF Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
移民 › 技术移民
RF>RF Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
经济 › 农场补贴
RF>RF Personal answer是的,但只应资助小的当地农场,而不是大公司 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
RF>RF Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
移民 › 公民考试
RF>RF Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
RF>RF Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
RF>RF Personal answer我对目前的支出额感到满意 |
经济 › VAT Rates
RF>RF Personal answer减少 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
RF>RF Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
RF>RF Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
RF>RF Personal answerNo, because every human being needs some sort of shelter and public spaces do not provide that, a hybrid project between the city and the homeless could be the answer to this issue. |
医保 › World Health Organization
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Gender Transition
RF>RF Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
经济 › State Ownership
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
RF>RF Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
RF>RF Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 22 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.